Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Robust Engineering Design for Failure Prevention

Published

Author(s)

Jeffrey T. Fong, James J. Filliben, Nathanael A. Heckert, Roland deWit, Barry Bernstein

Abstract

To advance the state of the art of engineering design, we introduce a new concept on the "robustness" of a structure by measuring its ability to sustain a sudden loss of a part without causing an immediate collapse.  The concept is based on the premise that most structures have built-in redundancy such that when the loss of a single part leads to a load redistribution, the "crippled" structure tends to seek a new stability configuration without immediate collapse.  This nice property of a "robust" structure, when coupled with a continuous or periodic  inspection program using nondestructive evaluation (NDE) techniques, is useful in failure prevention, because such structure is expected to display "measurable" signs of "weakening" long before the onset of catastrophic failure.  To quantify this "robustness" concept, we use a large number of simulations to develop a metric to be named the "Robustness Index (RBI)." To illustrate its application, we present two examples: (1) the design of a simple square grillage in support of  a  water tank, and  (2)  a  1/12-scale  model  of  the recently collapsed Minnesota bridge.  The first example is a "toy" problem, which turned out to be a good vehicle to test the feasibility of the RBI concept. The second example is based on news reports and a 1964 construction drawing of the collapsed bridge available to the public through the internet.  It is not a case study for failure analysis, but a useful classroom exercise in an engineering design course.  Significance and limitations of this new approach to catastrophic failure avoidance through "robust" design,  are discussed.  
Proceedings Title
Proceedings of ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Division Conference
Conference Dates
July 27-31, 2008
Conference Location
Chicago, IL

Keywords

aging structures, analysis of variance, applied mechanics, bridge design, design of experiments, engineering safety, error propagation, finite element method, NDE monitoring, RBI, robust design, robustness index, robustness metric, sensitivity analysis, statistical data analysis, structural robustness analysis, uncertainty analysis

Citation

Fong, J. , Filliben, J. , Heckert, N. , deWit, R. and Bernstein, B. (2008), Robust Engineering Design for Failure Prevention, Proceedings of ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Division Conference, Chicago, IL, [online], https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=152089 (Accessed June 17, 2024)

Issues

If you have any questions about this publication or are having problems accessing it, please contact reflib@nist.gov.

Created July 27, 2008, Updated February 17, 2017