Ferraiolo, D.
, Kuhn, D.
and Sandhu, R.
(2007),
RBAC Standard Rationale: Comments on "A Critique of the ANSI Standard on Role Based Access Control", IEEE Security & Privacy, [online], https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2007.173
(Accessed December 12, 2024)
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
RBAC Standard Rationale: Comments on "A Critique of the ANSI Standard on Role Based Access Control"
Published
Author(s)
, , R. Sandhu
Abstract
[This is a response to comments on INCITS Standard 359-2004, Role Based Access Control. For original paper see Ninghui Li et al., IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 5, no. 6, p.41, (2007).] Some notion of roles for access control predates the research papers cited by the authors by at least a decade. Our work was designed to formalize RBAC and add features (such as hierarchies and constraints) to make it more useful to software developers and administrators. Extensive discussion of these and subsequent papers over many years led to the consensus standard for RBAC.Citation
IEEE Security & Privacy
Volume
5
Issue
6
Pub Type
Journals
Download Paper
Keywords
authorization, emerging standards, RBAC, role-based access control, security, standards
Citation
Issues
If you have any questions about this publication or are having problems accessing it, please contact reflib@nist.gov.
Created December 12, 2007, Updated November 10, 2018