Skip to main content

NOTICE: Due to a lapse in annual appropriations, most of this website is not being updated. Learn more.

Form submissions will still be accepted but will not receive responses at this time. Sections of this site for programs using non-appropriated funds (such as NVLAP) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as CHIPS and NVD) will continue to be updated.

U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

RBAC Standard Rationale: Comments on "A Critique of the ANSI Standard on Role Based Access Control"

Published

Author(s)

David F. Ferraiolo, David R. Kuhn, R. Sandhu

Abstract

[This is a response to comments on INCITS Standard 359-2004, Role Based Access Control. For original paper see Ninghui Li et al., IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 5, no. 6, p.41, (2007).] Some notion of roles for access control predates the research papers cited by the authors by at least a decade. Our work was designed to formalize RBAC and add features (such as hierarchies and constraints) to make it more useful to software developers and administrators. Extensive discussion of these and subsequent papers over many years led to the consensus standard for RBAC.
Citation
IEEE Security & Privacy
Volume
5
Issue
6

Keywords

authorization, emerging standards, RBAC, role-based access control, security, standards

Citation

Ferraiolo, D. , Kuhn, D. and Sandhu, R. (2007), RBAC Standard Rationale: Comments on "A Critique of the ANSI Standard on Role Based Access Control", IEEE Security & Privacy, [online], https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2007.173 (Accessed October 12, 2025)

Issues

If you have any questions about this publication or are having problems accessing it, please contact [email protected].

Created December 12, 2007, Updated November 10, 2018
Was this page helpful?