Published: January 01, 2017
Samuel L. Manzello, Sayaka Suzuki, Daisaku Nii
The performance of tile roofing assemblies as well as untreated cedar shake roofing assemblies exposed to continuous firebrand showers were compared. Specifically, experiments were conducted for two types of concrete tile roofing assemblies (flat and profiled), one type of terracotta tile roofing assembly (flat), and an untreated (without any fire retardants) cedar shake roofing assembly. The roofing assemblies were conducted based on construction guidelines in the USA. The duration of the firebrand flux was fixed at 20 minutes, and the wind speed was varied from 6 m/s to 9 m/s. The average firebrand mass flux that arrived at the surface of the roofing assemblies was 0.3 g/m2s. These wind speeds were chosen to be able to compare roofing assembly performance to legacy test methods that use wood cribs as firebrand exposure, as well as prior work by the author to similar assemblies exposed to a batch-feed firebrand generator of limited firebrand exposure. Results indicated that for the untreated cedar shake assemblies, ignition occurred easily from the firebrand assault, and this type of roofing assembly generated their own firebrands after ignition. To attempt to quantify the degree of penetration, the number of firebrands that penetrated the tile roofing assemblies, and deposited onto the underlayment/counter-batten system was counted as function of wind speed for each assembly. Firebrand penetration was observed, even for the flat tile assemblies. It is believed these are the first-ever experiments in the peer-reviewed literature to determine wood and tile roofing experiments to continuous wind-driven firebrand showers.
Citation: Fire and Materials
Pub Type: Journals
WUI Fires, Roofing, Firebrands
Created January 01, 2017, Updated November 10, 2018