NOTICE: Due to a lapse in annual appropriations, most of this website is not being updated. Learn more.
Form submissions will still be accepted but will not receive responses at this time. Sections of this site for programs using non-appropriated funds (such as NVLAP) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as CHIPS and NVD) will continue to be updated.
An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Many problems entail the analysis of data that are independent and identically distributed random graphs. Useful inference requires flexible probability models for such random graphs; these models should have interpretable location and scale parameters, and support the establishement of confidence regions, maximum likelihood estimates, goodness-of-fit tests, Bayesian inference, and an appropriate analogue of linear model theory. Banks and Carley (1994) develop a simple probability model and sketch some analyses; this paper extends that work so that analysts are able to choose models that reflect application-specific metrics on the set of graphs. The strategy applies to graphs, directed graphs, hypergraphs, and trees, and often extends to objects in countable metric spaces.
Bernoulli graphs, clustering, Gibbs distribution, Holland-Leinhardt models, phylogney, trees
Citation
Banks, D.
and Constantine, G.
(1998),
Metric Models for Random Graphs, Journal of Classification, [online], https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=151732
(Accessed October 16, 2025)