Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Limestone and Silica Powder Replacements for Cement: Early-Age Performance

Published

Author(s)

Dale P. Bentz, Chiara F. Ferraris, Scott Z. Jones, Didier Lootens, Franco Zunino

Abstract

Developing functional concrete mixtures with less ordinary portland cement (OPC) has been one of the key objectives of the 21st century sustainability movement. While the supply of many alternatives to OPC (such as fly ash or slag) may be limited, those of limestone and silica powders produced by crushing rocks seem inexhaustible. The present study examines the chemical and physical influences of limestone and silica powders on the rheology, hydration, and setting of cement-based materials via experiments and three- dimensional microstructural modeling. It is shown that both limestone and silica particle surfaces serve as active templates (sites) for the nucleation and growth of cement hydration products, while the limestone itself is also somewhat soluble, leading to the formation of carboaluminate hydration products. Because the filler particles are incorporated as active members of the percolated backbone that constitutes initial setting of a cement-based system, replacements of up to 50 % of the OPC by either of these powders on a volumetric basis have minimal impact on the initial setting time, and even a paste with only 5 % OPC and 95 % limestone powder by volume achieves initial set within 24 h. While their influence on setting is similar, the limestone and silica powders produce pastes with quite different rheological properties, when substituted at the same volume level. When proceeding from setting to later age strength development, one must also consider the dilution of the system due to cement removal, along with the solubility/reactivity of the filler. However, for applications where controlled (prompt) setting is more critical than developing high strengths, such as mortar tile adhesives and renderings, significant levels of these powder replacements for cement can serve as sustainable, functional alternatives to the oft- employed 100 % OPC products.
Citation
Cement and Concrete Composites
Volume
78

Keywords

Early-age hydration, heat release, limestone powder, precipitation, setting time, silica powder, sustainability

Citation

Bentz, D. , Ferraris, C. , Jones, S. , Lootens, D. and Zunino, F. (2017), Limestone and Silica Powder Replacements for Cement: Early-Age Performance, Cement and Concrete Composites, [online], https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.01.001 (Accessed July 19, 2024)

Issues

If you have any questions about this publication or are having problems accessing it, please contact reflib@nist.gov.

Created January 5, 2017, Updated November 10, 2018