NOTICE: Due to a lapse in annual appropriations, most of this website is not being updated. Learn more.
Form submissions will still be accepted but will not receive responses at this time. Sections of this site for programs using non-appropriated funds (such as NVLAP) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as CHIPS and NVD) will continue to be updated.
An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Traditional economic growth mechanisms are critiqued to demonstrate long-term inadequacies for addressing the the technological and global competitive complexities challenging U.S. efforts to construct a set of policies that will revive domestic manufacturing. The bottom-line points are that (1) greater investment in productivity ehancing assets is required, (2) these assets are broad in scope, encompassing technology, capital formation, financing, and eduction, (3) an increasingly important characteristic of these assets is their public good content, which leads to the need for new public-private policy mechanisms, and (4) the critical R&D phase of the technology life cycle must now be managed by a focusing on three attributes: amount, composition, and efficiency of the R&D process
Tassey, G.
(2012),
The Future of National Manufacturing Policy, Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, [online], https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=912096
(Accessed October 21, 2025)