Skip to main content

NOTICE: Due to a lapse in annual appropriations, most of this website is not being updated. Learn more.

Form submissions will still be accepted but will not receive responses at this time. Sections of this site for programs using non-appropriated funds (such as NVLAP) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as CHIPS and NVD) will continue to be updated.

U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Determining geometric error model parameters of a terrestrial laser scanner through Two-face, Length-consistency, and Network methods

Published

Author(s)

Ling Wang, Bala Muralikrishnan, Prem K. Rachakonda, Daniel S. Sawyer

Abstract

Terrestrial laser scanners (TLS) are increasingly used in large-scale manufacturing and assembly where measurement uncertainties required are on the order of few tenth of a millimeter or smaller. In order to meet these stringent requirements, systematic errors within a TLS are compensated in-situ through a process referred to as self-calibration. In the network method, numerous targets distributed in the work-volume are measured from multiple locations of the scanner to determine parameters of the scanner error model. In this paper, we propose a two-face method based on front-face and back-face measurements that can offer lower uncertainties for several model parameters. We also propose a length-consistency method to determine model parameters as a more efficient method of realizing the network method. We compare our two-face method, the length-consistency method, and the network method in terms of the uncertainties in the model parameters, and demonstrate the validity of our techniques using two-face and calibrated scale bar measurements. The clear advantage of these self-calibration methods is that reference instrument or calibrated artifacts are not required, thus significantly lowering the cost involved in the calibration process.
Citation
Measurement Science & Technology
Volume
28
Issue
6

Keywords

Terrestrial laser scanners, Self-calibration, Geometric error model, Network method, Two-face method, Uncertainty

Citation

Wang, L. , Muralikrishnan, B. , Rachakonda, P. and Sawyer, D. (2017), Determining geometric error model parameters of a terrestrial laser scanner through Two-face, Length-consistency, and Network methods, Measurement Science & Technology (Accessed October 20, 2025)

Issues

If you have any questions about this publication or are having problems accessing it, please contact [email protected].

Created May 8, 2017, Updated October 12, 2021
Was this page helpful?