Contradictions and Justifications: Extensions to the Textual Entailment Task

Published

June 16, 2008

Author(s)

Ellen M. Voorhees

Abstract

The third PASCAL Recognizing Textual Entailment Challenge (RTE-3) contained an optional task that extended the main entailment task by requiring a system to make three-way entailment decisions (entails, contradicts, neither) and to justify its response.  Contradiction was rare in the RTE-3 test set, occurring in only about 10% of the cases, and systems found accurately detecting it difficult.  Subsequent analysis of the results shows a test set must contain many more entailment pairs for the three-way task than the traditional two-way task to have equal confidence in system comparisons.  Each of six human judges representing eventual end users rated the quality of a justification by assigning "understandability" and "correctness" scores.  Ratings of the same justification across judges differed significantly, signaling the need for a better characterization of the justification task.

Proceedings Title

Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (ACL 2008)

Conference Dates

June 15-20, 2008

Conference Location

Columbus, OH

Conference Title

46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (ACL 2008)

Pub Type

Conferences

Download Paper

Local Download

Keywords

natural language processing, textual entailment

Citation

Voorhees, E. (2008), Contradictions and Justifications: Extensions to the Textual Entailment Task, Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (ACL 2008), Columbus, OH, [online], https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=152115 (Accessed October 27, 2025)