Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Condensation Particle Counter Proportionality Calibration from 1 particle/cm^3 to 104 particles/cm^3

Published

Author(s)

Miles Owen, George W. Mulholland, William F. Guthrie

Abstract

The linearity of a condensation particle counter (CPC) (3760A, TSI, Inc.) for a monodisperse aerosol has been previously evaluated by comparison to an aerosol electrometer (AE) (Fletcher et al., 2009). The comparison of the CPC to the AE is an absolute calibration of the CPC with traceability to SI units. However, due to the limitations of the AE, accurate measurements of aerosol concentration cannot be performed below approximately 1000 particles•cm-3 for typical CPCs. Furthermore the linear model fit to the AE – CPC calibration data results in a statistically significant intercept (Fletcher et al., 2009), which causes discrepancies between the linear model and the CPC reading when extrapolated to lower concentrations. The presence of the intercept also introduces some reluctance to assume a proportional fit and extrapolate to zero. This creates problems for laboratories that require legal calibrations of CPCs at concentrations below 103 particles•cm-3. In this work a proportional statistical model for the CPC concentration is proposed, and an experimental method to verify the model and quantify the uncertainty of the fit over a wide range of concentrations is described. Traceability to SI units is achieved by comparing the CPC to an AE at high concentrations, fixing the constant of proportionality. The result is a CPC calibrated with traceability to SI units and uncertainties assigned to concentrations from 1 particle•cm-3 to 104 particles•cm-3.
Citation
Journal of Aerosol Science
Volume
46
Issue
4

Keywords

condensation particle counter calibration, proportionality calibration, traceability to SI units, diluter independent of concentration, sampling bias, flow calibration for condensation particle counter, wide concentration range, gas mask leakage, uncertainty analysis

Citation

Owen, M. , Mulholland, G. and Guthrie, W. (2011), Condensation Particle Counter Proportionality Calibration from 1 particle/cm^3 to 104 particles/cm^3, Journal of Aerosol Science, [online], https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=907153 (Accessed June 20, 2021)
Created November 29, 2011, Updated February 19, 2017