Yao, Q.
, Asa-Awuku, A.
, Zangmeister, C.
and Radney, J.
(2020),
Comparison of three essential submicron aerosol measurements: mass, size and shape, Aerosol Science and Technology, [online], https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2020.1763248, https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=929243
(Accessed April 20, 2024)
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Comparison of three essential submicron aerosol measurements: mass, size and shape
Published
Author(s)
, Akua Asa-Awuku, ,
Abstract
An instrumental trifecta now exists for aerosol separation and classification by mobility diameter (Dm), aerodynamic diameter (Dae) and mass (mp) utilizing a differential mobility analyzer (DMA), aerodynamic aerosol classifier (AAC) or aerosol particle mass analyzer (APM), respectively. In principle, any combination of two measurements yields the third. These quantities also allow for the derivation of the particle effective density (ρeff) and shape factor (χ). Measured and/or derived deviations between tandem measurements are dependent upon the configuration, but generally less than 10 % with non-physical values sometimes being reported. Harmonization of these measurement methods, and their uncertainties, will be required to improve data agreement and enable quantitative comparability between studies.Citation
Aerosol Science and Technology
Pub Type
Journals
Download Paper
Keywords
aerosol, metrology, aerodynamic diameter, mobility diameter, mass
Citation
Created May 28, 2020, Updated January 20, 2023