Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Https

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Comparison of Reagents for Shape Analysis of Fixed Cells by Automated Fluorescence Microscopy

Published

Author(s)

John T. Elliott, Alessandro Tona, Anne L. Plant

Abstract

Background: Cell size and shape have been implicated as potentiators intracellular signaling events and as indicator of abnormal cell behavior. Automated microscopy and image analysis can provide quantitative information about the size and shape of cultured cells, but it requires that the edge of a cell be clearly identified. Generating adequate contrast at the edge of thin well-spread cells can be challenging.Methods: We compared six (five chemically reactive and one lipophilic) fluorescent molecules, 5'chloromethyl fluorescein diacetate (CMFDA or Cell Tracker Green), fluorescein-5-maleimide, fluorescein-5-isothiocyanate (FITC), 5-iodoacetamidofluorescein, 5(6)-carboxy fluorescein-N-hydroxysuccinimidyl ester, and N-fluorescein-1,2-dihexadecanoyl-sn-glycerol-3-phos-phoethanolamine-for their as stains for automated cell morphology analysis of fixed cells.Results: Formaldehyde-fixed rat aortic smooth muscle cells stained with fluorescein-5- maleimide or FITC exhibited an average intensity that was at least twofold greater than cells stained with CMFDA, even when subjected to a 15-fold shorter exposure time. Cell area determined with the higher intensity stains was less sensitive to threshold settings during automated cell morphology analysis.Conclusion: A procedure that includes the use of fluorescein-5-maleimide or FITC for staining fixed cell provides sensitivity sufficient to permit rapid, automated, morphologic analysis of well-spread fixed cells.
Citation
Cytometry Part A
Volume
52A
Issue
2

Keywords

automated fluorescence microscopy, cell morphology analysis, fluorescent dyes, quantitative microscopy, stain
Created April 1, 2003, Updated February 19, 2017