NOTICE: Due to a lapse in annual appropriations, most of this website is not being updated. Learn more.
Form submissions will still be accepted but will not receive responses at this time. Sections of this site for programs using non-appropriated funds (such as NVLAP) or those that are excepted from the shutdown (such as CHIPS and NVD) will continue to be updated.
An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Comment on "Enhanced polarization and mechanisms in optically pumped hyperpolarized 3He in the presence of 4He"
Published
Author(s)
Thomas R. Gentile, M E. Hayden, P.J. Nacher, A K. Petukhov, B Saam, T G. Walker
Abstract
H.H. Chen et al [1] claim that adding 4He to spin-exchange optical pumping (SEOP) cells confines 3He atoms to a diffusion-limited region, which effectively reduces the wall relaxation factor X. Here X is a phenomenological parameter used to characterize typical SEOP cells; it quantifies the observation that the measured linear slope of the relaxation rate with alkali density exceeds the spin-exchange rate. In addition they claim to demonstrate that magnetic field gradients cause a diffusive motion of 3He. We argue that these claims and other central conclusions drawn by the the authors of [1] are unjustified and/or unphysical. We also draw attention to several additional issues and shortcomings associated with the results, analysis, and presentation of data in [1] that confound clear interpretation."
, T.
, Hayden, M.
, Nacher, P.
, Petukhov, A.
, Saam, B.
and Walker, T.
(2013),
Comment on "Enhanced polarization and mechanisms in optically pumped hyperpolarized <sup>3</sup>He in the presence of <sup>4</sup>He", Physical Review A
(Accessed October 10, 2025)