Colle, R.
and Colle, A.
(2015),
On the 209Po Half-Life Error and Its Confirmation: A Critique, Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry-Articles, [online], https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-015-4307-y
(Accessed October 10, 2025)
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
On the 209Po Half-Life Error and Its Confirmation: A Critique
Published
Author(s)
, Arthur M. Colle
Abstract
Collé, et al [(2007) Appl. Radiat Isot. 65, 728; (2014) J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 41, 105103], over the course of nearly a decade and with decay data from a period of 20.7 years, initially uncovered and then substantiated a 25 % error in the 209Po half-life. Pommé, et al [(2015) Appl. Radiat Isot. 97, 84] recently reported on a confirmation of the error, which was said to be based on another half-life determination. This paper addresses the issue as to whether the Pommé (2015) claim from measurements made over 0.8 % of one half-life can withstand critical scrutiny. Although the Collé (2014) and Pommé (2015) values of (125.3 3.3) a and (120 6) a, respectively, are ostensibly in agreement, that appearance is irrelevant to the larger issue as to what constitutes a valid half-life determination. This critique is intended to highlight, as an example, that a careful and realistic analysis beyond the mere fitting of decay data to an exponential function is required for the measurement and reporting of half-life values.Citation
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry-Articles
Pub Type
Journals
Download Paper
Keywords
data analysis, half-life, measurement uncertainty, polonium-209
Citation
Issues
If you have any questions about this publication or are having problems accessing it, please contact [email protected].
Created June 11, 2015, Updated November 10, 2018