Take a sneak peek at the new NIST.gov and let us know what you think!
(Please note: some content may not be complete on the beta site.).
NIST Authors in Bold
|Author(s):||Dong H. Rim; Lance L. Wallace; Andrew K. Persily; Jung I. Choi;|
|Title:||Evolution of Ultrafine Particle Size Distributions Following Indoor Episodic Releases: Relative Importance of Coagulation, Deposition and Ventilation|
|Published:||November 15, 2011|
|Abstract:||Indoor ultrafine particles (UFP, < 100 nm) undergo aerosol processes such as coagulation and deposition, which alter UFP size distribution and accordingly the level of exposure to UFP of different sizes. This study investigates the decay of indoor UFP originated from five different sources: a gas stove and an electric stove, a candle, a hair dryer, and power tools in a residential test building. An indoor aerosol model was developed to investigate differential effects of coagulation, deposition and ventilation. The coagulation model includes Brownian, van der Waals and viscosity forces, and also fractal geometry for particles > 24 nm. The model was parameterized using different values of the Hamaker constant for predicting the coagulation rate. Deposition was determined for two different conditions: central fan on vs. central fan off. For the case of a central fan running, deposition rates were measured by using a nonlinear solution to the mass balance equation for the whole building. For the central fan off case, an empirical model was used to estimate deposition rates. Ventilation was measured continuously using an automated tracer gas injection and sampling system. The study results show that coagulation is a significant aerosol process for UFP dynamics and the primary cause for the shift of particle size distribution following an episodic high-concentration UFP release with no fans on.. However, with the central mechanical fan on, UFP deposition loss is substantial and comparable to the coagulation loss. These results suggest that coagulation should be considered during high concentration periods (> 20, 000 cm-3), while particle deposition should be treated as a major loss mechanism when air recirculates through ductwork or mechanical systems.|
|Citation:||Aerosol Science and Technology|
|Pages:||pp. 494 - 506|
|Keywords:||Ultrafine particles, indoor sources, coagulation, deposition, dynamic aerosol model|
|Research Areas:||Indoor Air Quality, Building and Fire Research|
|PDF version:||Click here to retrieve PDF version of paper (2MB)|