NIST logo

Publication Citation: Interlaboratory Reproducibility of Size and Surface Charge Measurements on Nanoparticles prior to Biological Impact Assessment

NIST Authors in Bold

Author(s): Gert Roebben; Sonia Ramirez-Garcia; Vincent A. Hackley; Matthias Roesslein; Fred Klaessig; Vikram Kestens; Iseult Lynch; C. M. Garner; Alan Rawle; Allison Elder; Vicky Colvin; Wolfgang Kreyling; Harald Krug; Zuzanna Lewicka; Scott McNeil; Andre Nel; Anil K. Patri; Peter Wick; Tian Xia; Guenther Oberdoerster; Kenneth Dawson;
Title: Interlaboratory Reproducibility of Size and Surface Charge Measurements on Nanoparticles prior to Biological Impact Assessment
Published: June 03, 2011
Abstract: The International Alliance for NanoEHS Harmonization (IANH) organises interlaboratory comparisons of methods relevant for a better understanding of the biological impacts of nano-objects, to highlight and remove sources of irreproducibility in existing protocols. Here we show results of the first IANH studies. The test materials used (suspensions of Au, silica, polystyrene and ceria nanoparticles) were assessed for homogeneity, to ensure a minimal contribution to between-laboratory variability. Robust statistics were used in case of considerable within- and between-laboratory variability. It is shown that, if detailed shipping, test and reporting protocols are respected, measurement of the size of nanoparticles in monodisperse suspensions is reproducible, also for centrally prepared and globally shipped samples. This conclusion is not valid for measurements on more polydisperse suspensions of nanoparticles aggregates, for which ultrasonication was observed to even increase variability. Also, the variability of the measured zeta potential values indicates a need for better surface charge test protocols.
Citation: Nature Nanotechnology
Volume: 13
Issue: 7
Pages: pp. 2675 - 2687
Keywords: nanomaterial; nanoparticle; dispersion; interlaboratory study; zeta potential; particle size; toxicology; health
Research Areas: Nanomaterials, Nanotech/Environment, Health & Safety
PDF version: PDF Document Click here to retrieve PDF version of paper (628KB)