Take a sneak peek at the new NIST.gov and let us know what you think!
(Please note: some content may not be complete on the beta site.).
NIST Authors in Bold
|Author(s):||Gregory C. Tassey;|
|Title:||Tax Incentives for Innovation: Time to Restructure the R&E Tax Credit|
|Published:||January 12, 2007|
|Abstract:||The R&E tax credit was originally designed incorrectly, and subsequent attempts to restructure it have not addressed the major deficiencies. Moreover, in the 25 years since the R&E tax credit was enacted, a steadily increasing number of countries have implemented or expanded competing tax incentives, which in many cases are better structured and larger in size. As a result, the relative impact of the U.S. credit is now negative in terms of incentives to conduct R&D within the domestic economy. The inadequacy of the credit stems from both its small size and its incremental format. More specifically, the impact of an R&D tax incentive is affected by its scope of coverage, the ability of industry to take advantage of it over the entire R&D cycle, the magnitude of the incentive relative to other nations tax policies, and its ease of implementation. In the end, a tax incentive must lower the user s cost of R&D sufficiently to overcome barriers to allocation of private-sector resources commensurate with the potential rates of return on such investments. As a policy instrument, a tax incentive for R&D should be most effective if its form is a flat rate on all R&D.|
|Citation:||Journal Of Technology Transfer|
|Keywords:||E&D investment,innovation,innovation policy,R&D policy,R&E tax credit,tax policy|
|PDF version:||Click here to retrieve PDF version of paper (203KB)|