Take a sneak peek at the new NIST.gov and let us know what you think!
(Please note: some content may not be complete on the beta site.).
NIST Authors in Bold
|Author(s):||S K. Kunnath; Hai S. Lew; D Friis;|
|Title:||Global Response Modification Factors vs. Member Ductility-Based Modifiers|
|Published:||July 01, 2002|
|Abstract:||Most building structures today are designed using the response modification factors (R-factors) given in the code for different types of structural systems. This paper examines whether ductility-based modifiers for structural members (m-factors), recommended in FEMA-356 (Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, NEHRP 2000) are more representative of true demands and, therefore, a better alternative to R-factors in seismic design. Two case studies are summarized in this paper. The selected buildings were analyzed using linear static, linear dynamic, and nonlinear static procedures. Comparative studies between the global R-factor and the response-based m-factor indicate that the use of m-factors is more rational since it includes considerations of material behavior and is more representative of deformation demands at story levels. Additionally, mean estimates of m-factors were found to correlate reasonably well with mean demands computed using nonlinear dynamic procedures.|
|Conference:||Proceedings of the 7th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering|
|Dates:||July 21-25, 2002|
|Keywords:||dynamic analysis,earthquake engineering,nonlinear analysis,performance-based design,response modification factors,seismic design|
|Research Areas:||Building and Fire Research|