Take a sneak peek at the new NIST.gov and let us know what you think!
(Please note: some content may not be complete on the beta site.).

View the beta site
NIST logo

Publication Citation: Strength Evaluation of Connectors for Intermodal Containers

NIST Authors in Bold

Author(s): Hai S. Lew; Fahim Sadek; E D. Anderson;
Title: Strength Evaluation of Connectors for Intermodal Containers
Published: August 01, 2000
Abstract: Intermodal containers are used widely in marine cargo handling. In order to facilitate unloading of empty containers from ship to shore, two containers are lifted frequently in tandem. This operation is referred to as vertical tandem lifting. In this lifting process, the lower container is attached to the upper container by means of interbox connectors at the four corners of the container. During the vertical tandem lifting operation, if one or more connectors are disengaged the bottom box may be separated from the upper box, thereby creating an unsafe condition to workers below. This safety concern prompted the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to request the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to study the suitability of the use of of interbox connectors for the vertical tandem lifting.The NIST study included site visits to port facilities and laboratory tests of interbox connectors. Test specimens included semi-automatic twistlocks and latch locks. The experimental program included testing of twistlocks in tension, twistlock and latch lock assemblies with corner fittings in tension and compression, and shafts of twistlocks for the stress-strain relationship. In addition, measurements were made of the bearing area of the top and bottom cones of twistlocks and the latch on the inner surface of the corner fitting.
Citation: NIST Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR) - 6557
Keywords: container,corner fittings,interbox connectors,latch locks,marine transportation,twistlocks,vertical tandem lifts
Research Areas: Building and Fire Research
PDF version: PDF Document Click here to retrieve PDF version of paper (21MB)