Take a sneak peek at the new NIST.gov and let us know what you think!
(Please note: some content may not be complete on the beta site.).
Using high-performance inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (HP‑ICP-OES), relative expanded uncertainties on the order of 0.2 % can be routinely achieved. Nevertheless, analysis results can be improved by implementing “exact matching” with the HP-ICP-OES protocol. Exact matching refers to the very careful matching of the analyte mass fractions, internal standard element mass fractions, and solution matrices of the calibration solutions to the samples. The analytical benefits of this approach are being systematically investigated. Results show that the primary benefit is mitigation of the deleterious effects of nonlinearities of the ICP-OES instrument responses to the analyte and/or internal standard element mass fractions.
A thorough understanding of the analytical benefits and characteristics of the implementation of exact matching with HP-ICP-OES will enable HP-ICP-OES to be applied more effectively to a variety of NIST measurements. Such measurements include, but are not limited to, value assignment measurements for NIST Standard Reference Materials (SRMs). The accuracies and uncertainties attainable with HP-ICP-OES will be improved, benefitting NIST and many NIST customers. The findings of these studies will also enable users of HP-ICP-OES outside NIST to perform better analyses.
HP-ICP-OES was developed at NIST approximately a decade ago as a means of performing high-accuracy, low-uncertainty chemical analyses. HP-ICP-OES incorporates a robust experimental design, a unique drift correction procedure, a judiciously chosen internal standard, and gravimetric sample handling. It has become one of the main methodologies used at NIST for value assignment of SRMs that are certified for elemental content, including the SRM 3100 series single-element standard solutions. When HP-ICP-OES was first developed, it was assumed that the plasma would be sufficiently immune to matrix effects and small variations in analyte and internal standard element mass fractions to obviate any need for exact matching of standards to samples. Careful but less than exact matching was thought to be adequate. However, experience has shown that this is not necessarily the case. For many analytes, HP-ICP-OES precision and accuracy can be improved through exact matching.
Additional Technical Details:
The analytical characteristics and benefits of using exact matching with HP-ICP-OES are being systematically investigated. To date, comparisons of the results of HP-ICP-OES analyses with and without exact matching have been made for thirteen elements spanning the periodic table. These results have been correlated with the degrees of linearity of the ICP-OES instrument responses to the analyte and internal standard element mass fractions. Spreadsheet modeling using synthesized data characterized by varying degrees of linearity has been performed to confirm the findings of these studies. We are now in the process of comparing the results of HP-ICP-OES analyses while exactly matching analyte and internal standard element mass fractions, but varying matrix compositions.
Lead Organizational Unit:mml
Therese A. Butler
Michael R. Winchester
Related Programs and Projects:
Fundamental Chemical Metrology
Optimization of the Standard Additions Method Using Monte Carlo Simulation
Mercury Vapor Pressure Correlation
High-Precision Isotopic Measurements and Standards
Potential Primary Measurement Tool for the Quantification of DNA
Studies of Micro-Scale Heterogeneity of Solid Reference Materials
Evaluation of Independent High-Precision Assay Procedures for a High-Purity Primary Standard Reagent
High-Resolution Separations Technologies
Michael R. Winchester