Take a sneak peek at the new NIST.gov and let us know what you think!
(Please note: some content may not be complete on the beta site.).
NIST Authors in Bold
|Author(s):||Robert F. Berg; Michael R. Moldover;|
|Title:||Recommended viscosities of 11 dilute gases at 25¿°C|
|Published:||December 13, 2012|
|Abstract:||Commercially manufactured meters that measure the flow of a process gas are often calibrated with a known flow of a surrogate gas. This requires an accurate model of the flow meter and accurate values of the relevant thermophysical properties for both gases. In particular, calibrating a ,laminarŠ flow meter near ambient temperature and pressure requires that the ratio (process gas viscosity)/(surrogate gas viscosity) be known to approximately 0.1 %. With this motivation, we reviewed measurements of viscosity conducted with 17 instruments near 25 °C and zero density for 11 gases: He, Ne, Ar, Kr, Xe, H2, N2, CH4, C2H6, C3H8, and SF6. For these gases and this single state, we determined viscosity ratios with relative standard uncertainties ranging from 1.0×10-4 to 2.7×10-4 at a 68 % confidence level. Anchoring the ratios to the value (19.8253 ± 0.0002)×10-6 Pa s for the viscosity of helium calculated ab initio at 25 °C and zero density establishes a scale for gas viscosities that is more accurate than most of the reported values. To facilitate the extension of this scale, we recommend that researchers who calibrate gas viscometers (1) use helium as a calibration gas when possible, (2) report the values of all calibration data, and (3) report the uncertainties of their measured viscosity ratios. Similarly, we recommend that data archives capture this relevant calibration information.|
|Citation:||Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data|
|Pages:||pp. 1 - 10|
|Keywords:||dilute gases, helium, neon, argon, krypton, xenon, nitrogen, methane, ethane, propane, sulfur hexafluoride, viscosity, viscosity ratios|
|Research Areas:||Physical Properties, SRD (Fluids), Standard Reference Data, Thermophysics|
|PDF version:||Click here to retrieve PDF version of paper (1MB)|