Take a sneak peek at the new NIST.gov and let us know what you think!
(Please note: some content may not be complete on the beta site.).
NIST Authors in Bold
|Author(s):||Bryant C. Nelson; Bryce J. Marquis; Anna L. Seager; Ume K. Shah; Jane M. Mikhail; Shareen H. Doak; George E. Johnson; Paul L. Carmichael; Sharon J. Scott; Andrew D. Scott; Gareth J. Jenkins;|
|Title:||Pro-oxidant Induced DNA Damage in Human Lymphoblastoid Cells: Homeostatic Mechanisms of Genotoxic Tolerance|
|Published:||April 26, 2012|
|Abstract:||Oxidative stress contributes to many disease aetiologies including ageing, neurodegeneration, and cancer, partly through DNA damage induction (genotoxicity). Understanding the interactions of free radicals with DNA is fundamental to discern the mutation risks posed. In genetic toxicology, regulatory authorities view most genotoxins to exhibit a linear relationship between dose and mutagenic response. Yet, homeostatic mechanisms exist, including DNA repair, which allow cells to tolerate low levels of genotoxic exposure. Acceptance of thresholds for genotoxicity has widespread consequences in terms of understanding cancer risk and regulating human exposure to chemicals/ drugs. Three pro-oxidant chemicals, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), potassium bromate (KBrO3), and menadione, were examined for low dose-response curves in human lymphoblastoid cells. DNA repair and antioxidant capacity were assessed as possible threshold mechanisms. All three chemicals exhibited thresholded responses, containing a range of non-genotoxic low doses. Levels of the DNA glycosylase OGG1 were unchanged in response to pro-oxidant stress. DNA repair focussed gene expression arrays, however, reported upregulation of BRCA1, involved in double strand break repair, in response to low dose pro-oxidant exposure. Further, the H2O2 dose response curve was shifted by modulating the antioxidant glutathione. Hence, observed pro-oxidant thresholds were due to protective capacities of DNA repair enzymes and antioxidants against DNA damage, highlighting the importance of homeostatic mechanisms in ,genotoxic toleranceŠ.|
|Pages:||pp. 387 - 397|
|Research Areas:||Bioscience & Health|
|PDF version:||Click here to retrieve PDF version of paper (3MB)|