Take a sneak peek at the new NIST.gov and let us know what you think!
(Please note: some content may not be complete on the beta site.).
NIST Authors in Bold
|Author(s):||Koen Simoens; Bian Yang; Xuebing Zhou; Filipe Beato; Christoph Busch; Elaine M. Newton; Bart Preneel;|
|Title:||Criteria Towards Metrics for Benchmarking Template Protection Algorithms|
|Published:||March 30, 2012|
|Abstract:||Traditional criteria used in biometric performance evaluation do not cover all the performance aspects of biometric template protection (BTP) and the lack of well-deﬁned metrics inhibits the proper evaluation of such methods. Previous work in the literature focuses, in general, on a limited set of criteria and methods. This paper provides the ﬁrst holistic approach to the evaluation of biometric template protection that is able to cover a whole range of methods. We present a selection of well-deﬁned criteria and metrics that are compliant with the reference architecture for template protection as deﬁned in the recently adopted standard ISO/IEC 24745 (2011), which is applicable to nearly all known BTP methods. The metrics have been grouped in three categories of performance: technical, security and privacy, and operational. In addition, the visualization and representation of scores is discussed and a method for the uniﬁcation of scores is proposed.|
|Conference:||5th IEEE/IAPR International Conference on Biometrics (ICB 2012)|
|Proceedings:||Proceedings of the 5th IEEE/IAPR International Conference on Biometrics (ICB 2012)|
|Pages:||pp. 498 - 505|
|Location:||New Delhi, -1|
|Dates:||March 30-April 1, 2012|
|Keywords:||biometrics, template protection, BTP,renewable biometrics, revocable biometrics, cancellable biometrics, benchmark testing|
|DOI:||http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICB.2012.6199799 (Note: May link to a non-U.S. Government webpage)|
|PDF version:||Click here to retrieve PDF version of paper (185KB)|