You can access the new technical report Life-Cycle Analysis Datasets for Regionalized Plastic Pathways.
Life cycle assessment (LCA) information--all the information about a product, from its design to its production, use, and end of life (disposal or recycling)--is difficult to evaluate for plastic products. One key reason is the around what kind of impact plastics have when they reach the end of their useful life. Plenty of states and municipalities collect this information, but what they collect and how they collect it is not standardized. Additionally, new recycling technologies and approaches are being proposed or implemented, which could influence the impacts at the end of a product’s life.
The Life Cycle Assessment of Polymers to Improve Circularity project is targeting these uncertainties by assessing how LCAs of plastics can currently be completed, and targeting research and data gaps to improve the accuracy and transparency of life cycle evaluations. Together with Argonne National Laboratory (Department of Energy), this project is evaluating the tools and databases that currently exist for completing LCAs for plastics to identify areas for improvement including data and modeling gaps. By reducing these gaps, NIST will improve the standardization, robustness, and accuracy of data used to quantify the circularity of plastics, and in doing so, assist decision makers such as the US, states, and municipalities to improve their reuse and recycling infrastructures.
The project has three goals:
This project is part of NIST's Circular Economy program, which supports the nation’s need to transition away from a model in which materials are extracted from the environment, manufactured into products, used, then discarded (a so called “linear economy”) toward one in which the atoms and molecules that make up those products repeatedly cycle within the economy and retain their value.
One goal of this project is to use LCA data to improve the circularity of plastics. At NIST, we are specifically looking at how circular plastics are when they reach the end of their useful life. Are they landfilled or incinerated, or do they go to a mechanical or chemical recycling plant and cycled back into the economy?
The initial problem this project is trying to solve is the inconsistencies across LCA data and software for evaluating plastics. To do this, we’re investigating the Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) databases and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) modeling tools that currently exist and how comparable they are to one another. In other words, we’re measuring the problem by surveying the data and tools that are currently used for LCA of plastics. The diagram below has the databases and software that are being evaluated as well as the potential end-of-life scenarios for plastics.
One clear gap in the LCA of plastics identified by both the literature review and the assessment of existing databases and tools is a need for regionalized production pathways for different plastics. The most recent publication under this project developed LCA data for new pathways for production of plastic resins and other chemicals in other countries/regions to assist in evaluating circularity in the global plastics supply chain. The LCA data will improve the accuracy of quantifying the environmental impacts of plastic materials by providing more refined analysis through regionalization of data in the global plastic manufacturing process. Existing GREET models will be modified for countries with similar technologies to the U.S. with the appropriate electricity grid, fuels, and input supply chains (minimum 4 regions, 20 resin-region combinations in total). High volume plastic resin pathways analyzed were polyethylene terephthalate (PET), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), low-density polyethylene (LDPE), polypropylene (PP), and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) for four world regions: US, Western Europe, China, and Middle East - North Africa (MENA). One of the key drivers of variation across regions was differences in the electricity grid of the region.
The focus of the current study under this project is to assess key additives to determine their impact on recyclability and the associated environmental impacts. The study has begun by categorizing and identifying key plastic additives that can prevent plastic recycling and potentially cause health and environmental issues. The study will Investigate the LCA impacts of at least six key additive production pathways to identify the culprit additives that pose technical difficulties in recycling and incur potential health and environmental issues during and/or after recycling processes of at least four major resins. Finally, the study will quantify the potential loss in mass and/or value of plastic recycling flow due to the presence of those culprit additives and estimate the potential environmental benefits of replacing those culprit additives with alternatives.
Accurate and transparent Life Cycle Assessments are important for American consumers and the private sector because they allow producers to make accurate claims about a product and consumers to confirm these claims. For example, if a business is marketing their products as “sustainable,” then an LCA of those products can give that business data to back up the claim. The consumer, in turn, can look at the metrics that the business uses to back up their claim of sustainable--percentage of recycled materials used, approximate greenhouse gas emissions involved in production, gallons of water saved, etc.
Reliable LCI data and LCA modeling tools will help the research and non-profit realms evaluate not only plastics, but other materials, like the steel, cement, and wood used in infrastructure and the built environment. NIST is also working with American and international standards development organizations to identify what kind of life cycle data and tools industry and governments need.