NIST Center for Metal Forming

Summary:

Our objective is to develop the measurement methodology, standards and analysis necessary for the US auto industry and base metal suppliers to transition from a strain-based to a stress-based design system for auto body components, and successfully transfer this technology to our customers in industry. With this knowledge, the US automotive industry will be able to transition to new advanced and lightweight materials more easily, as more accurate data and material models will lead to more accurate die designs, reducing die tryouts and new model development costs. 

Description:

The US auto industry spends $600M per year fixing and tweaking forming dies that do not make correct parts. The primary reason that the dies are inaccurate is that the computer models of the dies utilize materials models that are inaccurate. Upon surveying our industrial partners, we determined that a key NIST role in addressing this problem lies in developing new mechanical testing methods and metrology, and also developing a fundamental understanding of the interplay between multiaxial strain behavior and sheet microstructure.

 springback cup test

Springback Cup Test

We have developed a technique where, for the first time, the sheet's stress-strain response can be measured along non-linear multiaxial paths. This provides unique data on how the multiaxial flow surface changes with plastic strain, and this can be used to modify materials models used by industry. Concurrent with this, we also measure the evolving crystallographic texture of the sheet and the surface roughness, to develop a microstructural understanding of the materials' deformation response.

Major Accomplishments:

The tensile multiaxial yield surface of 5754 aluminum alloy sheet was measured from initial yield up to failure for the first time. The initial shape of the surface closely approximates an ellipse, as predicted by most plasticity models of forming. However, as the strain levels increase to levels typical of forming (5% to 20% plastic strain), the locus evolves asymmetrically, and an apex forms in the direction of balanced biaxial (BB) straining. At the highest strain levels, the error between the predicted and the measured flow stresses exceeds 25%.

yield locus

Yield locus evolution 

On the same samples, the crystallographic texture evolves from a rolling texture to one of the predominant FCC deformation textures, as expected. Unexpectedly, the deformation texture that develops when the sheet is deformed in the rolling direction (RD) differs from that which develops during deformation in the transverse direction (TD). The two deformation textures are 90 degree rotations with respect to one another, but the twofold symmetries of the textures leads to an asymmetry in the stress needed to form the textures, which coincides with the measured asymmetry in the yield surface. These results are being modeled using a Taylor-type description of the flow behavior of polycrystalline aggregates undergoing evolving textures, which is the basis of many common plasticity models, to see if this formulation adequately captures the behavior.

texture evolution

Texture evolution with strain

Surface roughness, and how it changes with plastic strain and contributes to forming friction, is another highly important issue. Conventionally, rough-ness is measured with a profilometer. But we have found that these measures may be misleading—as both measurement uncertainties and statistical errors are compounded when the 2-D lines are extrapolated to the entire surface.

surface roughness evolution

Surface roughness evolution with strain

Our new approach uses data from a scanning laser confocal microscope, an instrument that builds a point-by-point image of a surface in 3-D. The data from a single image—representing an area of about 1000 µm X 800 µm x 20 µm in depth—are analyzed using mathematical techniques that treat every point in the image simultaneously to produce a roughness measure that considers the entire 3-D surface rather than a collection of 2-D stripes. This technique will reduce uncertainties in the measured surface roughness and allow more accurate characterization of the evolution of roughness with strain.

light car frame

Start Date:

October 1, 2003

End Date:

ongoing

Lead Organizational Unit:

MSEL

Staff:

Contact

General Information:
Timothy Foecke
timothy.foecke@nist.gov
301-975-6592 Telephone
301-975-4553 Facsimile

100 Bureau Drive, M/S 8553
Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8553