Take a sneak peek at the new NIST.gov and let us know what you think!
(Please note: some content may not be complete on the beta site.).

View the beta site
NIST logo

Publication Citation: Response to Comments on the National Institute of Standards and Technology Investigation of the 2001 World Trade Center Fires

NIST Authors in Bold

Author(s): Richard G. Gann; Anthony P. Hamins; Therese P. McAllister; Kevin B. McGrattan; William M. Pitts; Kuldeep R. Prasad;
Title: Response to Comments on the National Institute of Standards and Technology Investigation of the 2001 World Trade Center Fires
Published: April 15, 2014
Abstract: The editor of a special issue of Fire Technology invited the NIST authors to address the NIST Investigation of the WTC disaster and associated practice and research progress in the 10 years since then. The three published papers are a summary of the extensive investigation of the collapses of the WTC 1, WTC 2, and WTC 7 buildings. Professors Quintiere and Williams have a hypothesis of the WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapses that differs from the accumulated evidence and performed analyses in the NIST reports. This letter provides citations to the documentation of aspects of the Investigation that Profs. Quintere and Williams wrongly assert were not considered or were considered incorrectly in the NIST investigation. NIST stands by its findings.
Citation: Journal of Fire Sciences
Pages: 5 pp.
Keywords: NIST Investigation, September 11, World Trade Center
Research Areas: Building and Fire Research, Disaster Investigations
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0734904114528457  (Note: May link to a non-U.S. Government webpage)