NIST logo

Publication Citation: To Predict Vibrational Spectra, Are Anharmonic Calculations Worthwhile?

NIST Authors in Bold

Author(s): Ruth L. Jacobsen; Karl K. Irikura; Russell D. Johnson III; Raghu N. Kacker;
Title: To Predict Vibrational Spectra, Are Anharmonic Calculations Worthwhile?
Published: January 22, 2013
Abstract: Anharmonic calculations using vibrational perturbation theory are known to provide near-spectroscopic accuracy when combined with high-level ab initio potential energy functions. However, performance with economical, popular electronic structure methods is less well characterized. We compare the accuracy of harmonic and anharmonic predictions from Hartree-Fock, second-order perturbation, and density functional theories combined with 6-31G(d) and 6-31+G(d,p) basis sets. As expected, anharmonic frequencies are closer than harmonic frequencies to experimental fundamentals. However, common practice is to correct harmonic predictions using multiplicative scaling. The surprising conclusion is that scaled anharmonic calculations are no more accurate than scaled harmonic calculations. The data used are from the Computational Chemistry Comparison and Benchmark Database (CCCBDB), maintained by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, which includes more than 3939 independent vibrations for 358 molecules.
Citation: Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Volume: 9
Issue: 2
Pages: pp. 951 - 954
Keywords: Harmonic frequencies; anharmonic frequencies; scaling; second-order vibrational perturbation theory; VPT2; Hartree-Fock; second-order perturbation theory; density functional theory; HF; MP2; DFT; B3LYP; quantum chemistry
Research Areas: Spectroscopy, Vibrational, Chemistry
DOI:  (Note: May link to a non-U.S. Government webpage)
PDF version: PDF Document Click here to retrieve PDF version of paper (530KB)