Take a sneak peek at the new NIST.gov and let us know what you think!
(Please note: some content may not be complete on the beta site.).
NIST Authors in Bold
|Author(s):||Ruth L. Jacobsen; Karl K. Irikura; Russell D. Johnson III; Raghu N. Kacker;|
|Title:||To Predict Vibrational Spectra, Are Anharmonic Calculations Worthwhile?|
|Published:||January 22, 2013|
|Abstract:||Anharmonic calculations using vibrational perturbation theory are known to provide near-spectroscopic accuracy when combined with high-level ab initio potential energy functions. However, performance with economical, popular electronic structure methods is less well characterized. We compare the accuracy of harmonic and anharmonic predictions from Hartree-Fock, second-order perturbation, and density functional theories combined with 6-31G(d) and 6-31+G(d,p) basis sets. As expected, anharmonic frequencies are closer than harmonic frequencies to experimental fundamentals. However, common practice is to correct harmonic predictions using multiplicative scaling. The surprising conclusion is that scaled anharmonic calculations are no more accurate than scaled harmonic calculations. The data used are from the Computational Chemistry Comparison and Benchmark Database (CCCBDB), maintained by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, which includes more than 3939 independent vibrations for 358 molecules.|
|Citation:||Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation|
|Pages:||pp. 951 - 954|
|Keywords:||Harmonic frequencies, anharmonic frequencies, scaling, second-order vibrational perturbation theory, VPT2, Hartree-Fock, second-order perturbation theory, density functional theory, HF, MP2, DFT, B3LYP, quantum chemistry|
|Research Areas:||Spectroscopy, Vibrational, Chemistry|
|DOI:||http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ct300293a (Note: May link to a non-U.S. Government webpage)|
|PDF version:||Click here to retrieve PDF version of paper (530KB)|