Take a sneak peek at the new NIST.gov and let us know what you think!
(Please note: some content may not be complete on the beta site.).
NIST Authors in Bold
|Author(s):||Blaza Toman; Clemens Elster;|
|Title:||Bayesian Uncertainty Analysis for a Regression Model Versus Application of GUM Supplement 1 to the Least-Squares Estimate|
|Published:||May 05, 2011|
|Abstract:||Application of least-squares as, for instance, in curve fitting is an important tool of data analysis in metrology. It is tempting to employ the supplement 1 to the GUM (GUM-S1) to evaluate the uncertainty associated with the resulting parameter estimates, albeit doing so is beyond the specified scope of GUM-S1. We compare the result of such a procedure to a Bayesian uncertainty analysis of the corresponding regression model. It is shown that under certain assumptions both analyses yield the same results but this is not true in general. Some simple examples are given which illustrate the similarities and differences between the two approaches.|
|Keywords:||Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis, GUM Supplement 1, Bayesian analysis, least squares estimation.|
|Research Areas:||Math, Statistics|
|PDF version:||Click here to retrieve PDF version of paper (325KB)|