Take a sneak peek at the new NIST.gov and let us know what you think!
(Please note: some content may not be complete on the beta site.).
NIST Authors in Bold
|Author(s):||Theodore D. Doiron; Dennis S. Everett; Bryon S. Faust; Eric S. Stanfield; John R. Stoup;|
|Title:||Case Against Optical Gauge Block Metrology|
|Published:||September 01, 1998|
|Abstract:||The current definition of length of a gage block is a very clever attempt to evade the systematic errors associated with the wringing layer thickness and optical phase corrections. In practice, there are very large systematic operator and surface effects which cause systematic errors and most laboratories wring blocks to quartz or fused silica. We present quantitative data on these effects and show through detailed uncertainty budgets that the current definition of gage block length is the primary source of measurement uncertainty. For comparison, an uncertainty budget for gage block calibration by mechanical contact is presented.|
|Conference:||Recent Developments in Optical Gauge Block Metrology, Jennifer E. Decker, Nicholas Brown, Editors|
|Proceedings:||Proceedings of SPIE|
|Pages:||pp. 188 - 198|
|Location:||San Diego, CA|
|Dates:||July 20, 1998|
|Keywords:||dimensional metrology,gage block,gauge block,interferometry,measurement uncertainty,mechanical deformation,operator bias,optical phase,wringing layers|
|Research Areas:||Metrology, Manufacturing|